<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Annvix Development Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.annvix.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.annvix.org</link>
	<description>Charting Annvix Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 22:09:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Development on hold indefinitely</title>
		<link>http://blog.annvix.org/2008/03/30/development-on-hold-indefinitely/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.annvix.org/2008/03/30/development-on-hold-indefinitely/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 22:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Danen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.annvix.org/2008/03/30/development-on-hold-indefinitely/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is with great regret that I announce that development of Annvix will be on hold indefinitely.  At this point, I do not forsee continuing development in the future at all, at least not as an entire operating system.
In November of 2003, I started Annvix to build a Linux distro that was meant to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is with great regret that I announce that development of Annvix will be on hold indefinitely.  At this point, I do not forsee continuing development in the future at all, at least not as an entire operating system.</p>
<p>In November of 2003, I started Annvix to build a Linux distro that was meant to be secure and fast.  I feel that this goal has been met and exceeded&#8230; Annvix is secure, and it is fast.  It&#8217;s light-weight, with a low memory and hard disk footprint making it ideal for any number of applications.  I know there are many who currently use it, and who have used it in the past, who feel the same.</p>
<p>Annvix, in it&#8217;s 4.5 years, became perhaps one of the most unique Linux distributions out there.  It broke out of the old mold&#8230; it did things differently &#8212; some things better, some things probably worse.  I feel that overall it was better and despite a learning curve, Annvix was a great server distribution.</p>
<p>To that end, technologically, Annvix is a great success and I am proud  to have worked on it for 4.5 years.  It was also meant as a learning experience, and by that it truly was &#8212; you cannot possibly appreciate the amount of work that goes into an operating system until you deal with the nuts and bolts of it.  Annvix was a fantastic experience that I do not regret.  It taught me new development skills, problem solving and QA skills, taught me how the management of a distribution could work and does work.</p>
<p>I do not, and never will, regret giving 4.5 years to this project.</p>
<p>Annvix was never about making money.  I never set out to create a Mandriva-killer, or Ubuntu-killer, or any other distro.  I didn&#8217;t expect to make a million dollars doing it.  Having said that, Annvix was never about losing money either, and if I calculate the out-of-pocket costs for this project, it was an expensive hobby.  When I calculate the cost of my time involved, that figure rises &#8212; to over $250,000 in time.  That is time I can never get back, and while the cost to me so far has been acceptable (out-of-pocket and time), it&#8217;s no longer feasible especially when the rewards are so limiting.  With expenses of over $10,000 in 4.5 years, contrasted to donations of $500 in the same time frame, I suspect that I&#8217;ve pushed this project longer than most people would have &#8212; especially considering the amount of help that was received (not just financial, but in terms of user participation, testing, documentation, development, and general responsiveness).</p>
<p>The sad thing is, I know there are well over 200 Annvix installs out there.  I also know that one individual donated 40% of that money, and also donated time to test and develop.  The other 60%&#8230;. well, suffice it to say that most of that was for referral links on the website.  I think it would be generous to say that 20% of that $500, beyond what Ying donated, was for actual appreciation of the distribution. So for that, I&#8217;d like to thank Ying-Hung Chen, not only for his time and effort invested in Annvix, but for the donations he made to the project. He has been with Annvix almost since the beginning and has remained a steadfast friend and source of encouragement, and has expressed his appreciation many times, and in many ways.</p>
<p>Annvix, as an operating system, will most certainly no longer continue. It may come back in some form, as secure package add-ons to different operating systems perhaps, but likely not for some time.  It&#8217;s time that I gave my time to myself and to my family.</p>
<p>The website and subversion repository will still remain available for some time (thank you, Ying, for offering to host the subversion repository).  The repository should be back in a few days or so. Bugzilla will most likely be shut down.  The mailing lists will be shut down sometime this week.  Development and package updates will not be forthcoming.</p>
<p>This has been a difficult decision for me, but I feel I&#8217;ve made the right one given the lack of response to the questions posted recently on the mailing list about the future of Annvix, and given the calculated personal cost.  Even now as I migrate some of my systems away from Annvix, I&#8217;m struck by how much more difficult it is to manage them, how much slower they are and how much more overhead they have.  At this point, given the alternative, these are compromises I am willing to make.</p>
<p>So for those of you who use Annvix, thank you for giving it a try and I hope you enjoyed it.  And, again, I&#8217;d like to express my sincerest gratitude to Ying-Hung Chen for his help on many fronts, and I&#8217;d also like to thank other individuals who have given me help when it was needed:  Thomas Backlund, Chmouel Boudjnah, Sean P. Thomas&#8230; there are likely more who have helped in little ways and I apologize if I neglect to mention you.  Thank you so much for the help you&#8217;ve given me with this project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.annvix.org/2008/03/30/development-on-hold-indefinitely/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Potential build server upgrade</title>
		<link>http://blog.annvix.org/2008/03/18/potential-build-server-upgrade/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.annvix.org/2008/03/18/potential-build-server-upgrade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Danen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.annvix.org/2008/03/18/potential-build-server-upgrade/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m looking at possibly upgrading the build system for Annvix.  It&#8217;s currently using a 3-year-old dual opteron system that&#8217;s starting to show it&#8217;s age (dual 1.8GHz, 2GB RAM).
The system I&#8217;m looking at replacing it with is a ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m looking at possibly upgrading the build system for Annvix.  It&#8217;s currently using a 3-year-old dual opteron system that&#8217;s starting to show it&#8217;s age (dual 1.8GHz, 2GB RAM).</p>
<p>The system I&#8217;m looking at replacing it with is a <a href=http://www.sun.com/servers/x64/x2200/">Sunfire X2200 M2</a> which would be a quad-core 2.6GHz opteron (dual CPU, dual core) with 4GB RAM.  Suffice it to say, that&#8217;s a pretty good upgrade that will make compiling things much faster, not to mention save some energy by dropping from a big 3U system to a 1U system.</p>
<p>Problem is, even with Sun&#8217;s 25% off try-and-buy, it will still cost about $2750CAD (once you throw taxes and such in there).  I don&#8217;t really have $2700 to throw at Annvix right now, but I think a new build machine is important (especially as I&#8217;d like to get more people involved and they would have access to the machine to compile stuff as well).</p>
<p>If I could raise even half of this in donations (let&#8217;s say $1500CAD), then it would be viable for me to invest the rest (including new/larger HDDs).</p>
<p>Donation &#8220;drives&#8221; for Annvix have rarely been successful in the past&#8230; I&#8217;m not sure if this time will be any different, but if you like and find Annvix useful, please consider making a donation.  If you&#8217;ve thought of donating before but didn&#8217;t want it to just end up &#8220;somewhere&#8221;, at least now you&#8217;ll know it&#8217;s going into hardware (unless someone wants to donate an equivalent system?).  Now would be a good time to donate if you&#8217;ve thought about it and haven&#8217;t done so in the past.  This development machine would get quite a bit of mileage and would be a real boon to the project.</p>
<p>Info on donating can be found on the <a href="http://annvix.org/Annvix:Site_support">donations</a> page.  Thank you for the consideration!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.annvix.org/2008/03/18/potential-build-server-upgrade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Annvix 3.0-RELEASE-r2 ISOs now available</title>
		<link>http://blog.annvix.org/2008/03/17/annvix-30-release-r2-isos-now-available/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.annvix.org/2008/03/17/annvix-30-release-r2-isos-now-available/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 00:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Danen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.annvix.org/2008/03/17/annvix-30-release-r2-isos-now-available/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New ISOs are now up that fix the boot issues with non-PAE-supporting CPUs.  The new ISOs are currently on ibiblio and will be on the other mirrors soon.  If you still have trouble with these kernels, please use Bugzilla to report the issues.
The main problem was that during 2.1-CURRENT we stopped building i586 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New ISOs are now up that fix the boot issues with non-PAE-supporting CPUs.  The new ISOs are currently on ibiblio and will be on the other mirrors soon.  If you still have trouble with these kernels, please use <a href="https://bugs.annvix.org/">Bugzilla</a> to report the issues.</p>
<p>The main problem was that during 2.1-CURRENT we stopped building i586 kernels with support for 4GB of RAM and instead started building i686 kernels with support for 64GB RAM, the latter requiring PAE support to properly implement.  This is now fixed by reverting back to the i586+4GB kernels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.annvix.org/2008/03/17/annvix-30-release-r2-isos-now-available/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Annvix boot charts</title>
		<link>http://blog.annvix.org/2008/03/14/annvix-boot-charts/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.annvix.org/2008/03/14/annvix-boot-charts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 03:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Danen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bootchart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.annvix.org/2008/03/14/annvix-boot-charts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve put up a few boot charts on the website and compared Annvix boot time to Mandriva&#8217;s Corporate Server 4.  I don&#8217;t mean to pick on CS4, but I think CS4 is pretty decent and pretty quick&#8230; and I had it on hand.  I may add CentOS 5.1 to the page as well&#8230; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve put up a few <a href="http://annvix.org/Documentation/Bootchart">boot charts</a> on the website and compared Annvix boot time to Mandriva&#8217;s Corporate Server 4.  I don&#8217;t mean to pick on CS4, but I think CS4 is pretty decent and pretty quick&#8230; and I had it on hand.  I may add CentOS 5.1 to the page as well&#8230; I do have it installed in vmware.</p>
<p>While the charts themselves are kinda cool to look at, the thing that I think is really cool is the boot times: 12s on a default install and 12s with a half dozen services added and starting.  In comparison, CS4 took 26s.  These are in vmware, of course, with modest amounts of RAM allocated (although the host system is a mac pro running 2 2.66Ghz dual-core xeons).</p>
<p>Anyways, it&#8217;s interesting stuff&#8230; if you&#8217;re interested in that kind of thing (although, I think for a server OS the boot speed is a pretty minor consideration since it&#8217;s not supposed to be booting that often (and if it is, you have other problems)).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.annvix.org/2008/03/14/annvix-boot-charts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Annvix as development server</title>
		<link>http://blog.annvix.org/2008/02/21/annvix-as-development-server/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.annvix.org/2008/02/21/annvix-as-development-server/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 03:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ying-Hung Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Testimonials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[embedded]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engineer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.annvix.org/2008/02/21/annvix-as-development-server/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been running annvix as server, (e.g. email, DNS, web, source control&#8230;etc) since 1.0. Recently, I have been using it as development machines for my RD Department.
My group is focusing to embedded Linux development, which means we need to have a perfectly working (and standard compliance) machine to install tons of cross compilers and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been running annvix as server, (e.g. email, DNS, web, source control&#8230;etc) since 1.0. Recently, I have been using it as development machines for my RD Department.</p>
<p>My group is focusing to embedded Linux development, which means we need to have a perfectly working (and standard compliance) machine to install tons of cross compilers and tools for each different Hardware/solution providers. The previous group was using mostly Fedora, Ubuntu based distributions, although they look ok at first glance, it fails in a lot of areas since Fedora and Ubuntu is trying to be too user friendly. This is especially true for Ubuntu, the shell script inside the Makefile doesn&#8217;t even work as &#8216;expected&#8217; without some tuning. (trust me, I have used more than 5 well known distributions, ubuntu was very troublesome for embedded development environment)</p>
<p>Of course, my post is not about how bad other ones are, and how good annvix are. Different distribution serves for different purposes.</p>
<p>I just want to express my success with annvix distribution and proud to be one of the developer .</p>
<p>My RD department currently have one source control server and four development server (aka, build machines) and engineers are really happy with the stability and performance of the system.</p>
<p>This is great work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.annvix.org/2008/02/21/annvix-as-development-server/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Annvix featured in upcoming Linux+ Magazine</title>
		<link>http://blog.annvix.org/2008/02/18/annvix-featured-in-upcoming-linux-magazine/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.annvix.org/2008/02/18/annvix-featured-in-upcoming-linux-magazine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Danen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.annvix.org/2008/02/18/annvix-featured-in-upcoming-linux-magazine/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The February 2008 issue of Linux+ Magazine has a feature article on installing Annvix.  The magazine isn&#8217;t listed on their site yet, but I got my copy of it in the mail today (probably a pre-release copy since I wrote the article).  I suspect it should be coming out and being generally available [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The February 2008 issue of <a href="http://lpmagazine.org">Linux+ Magazine</a> has a feature article on installing Annvix.  The magazine isn&#8217;t listed on their site yet, but I got my copy of it in the mail today (probably a pre-release copy since I wrote the article).  I suspect it should be coming out and being generally available soon, but this is a bit of a milestone for Annvix as this is the first time (that I&#8217;m aware of) that Annvix has been noted in print, as opposed to on the web.</p>
<p>I believe you can pick up Linux+ Magazine at Barnes &#038; Nobles in the USA, and probably a few other outfits.  Doesn&#8217;t seem to be carried at Chapters here in Canada, however.  The magazine is out of Poland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.annvix.org/2008/02/18/annvix-featured-in-upcoming-linux-magazine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Annvix testimonial</title>
		<link>http://blog.annvix.org/2008/02/18/new-annvix-testimonial/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.annvix.org/2008/02/18/new-annvix-testimonial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Danen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Testimonials]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.annvix.org/2008/02/18/new-annvix-testimonial/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following testimonial was sent on the users@ mailing list on Feb 14th by David:
Well, I&#8217;ve had fun getting Annvix set up. Using a PIII-750MHz, and base install was barely over 300 MB. After installing apache + php, and my folding program, I am now using annvix as experimental web server at admiral.ath.cx and also [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following testimonial was sent on the users@ mailing list on Feb 14th by David:</p>
<p><i>Well, I&#8217;ve had fun getting Annvix set up. Using a PIII-750MHz, and base install was barely over 300 MB. After installing apache + php, and my folding program, I am now using annvix as experimental web server at admiral.ath.cx and also for folding client &#8211; see http://fortressdataprotection.com/folding</p>
<p>After completing configuration of the server, it still only takes up about 325 MB on the hard drive.                                                                                                                                                             </p>
<p>I formerly used Trustix Secure Linux, but development was stopped this year, so I was looking for a seceure server distro that would run on older hardware.  Annvix is it! Thanks for a great distro! And for great support.  I love it, and plan to experiment with its capabilities for use as web server and for running other select apps. THANKS FOR ANNVIX.<br />
</i></p>
<p>Thanks for the kind words, David!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.annvix.org/2008/02/18/new-annvix-testimonial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3.1-CURRENT (Gaia) branched</title>
		<link>http://blog.annvix.org/2008/02/03/31-current-gaia-branched/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.annvix.org/2008/02/03/31-current-gaia-branched/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 22:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Danen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.annvix.org/2008/02/03/31-current-gaia-branched/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve just branched 3.1-CURRENT and updated the mirrors, so the apt metadata for &#8216;current&#8217; now points to 3.1-CURRENT.  2.0-RELEASE is still on the mirrors for the time being but for all intents and purposes it is dead and no longer supported.  In other words, please upgrade if you haven&#8217;t already.
I&#8217;m hoping to accelerate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just branched 3.1-CURRENT and updated the mirrors, so the apt metadata for &#8216;current&#8217; now points to 3.1-CURRENT.  2.0-RELEASE is still on the mirrors for the time being but for all intents and purposes it is dead and no longer supported.  In other words, please upgrade if you haven&#8217;t already.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m hoping to accelerate things a bit and have a year between releases, even if they are smaller releases.  I.e. 2.1-CURRENT really should have been 2.1-RELEASE, but due to the high number of changes, it was a much more significant release (thus being called 3.0).  3.1 should be a much more minor &#8220;point&#8221; release.  The things I&#8217;d like to concentrate on here are newer versions of stuff, provided they are relatively compatible with what&#8217;s currently in 3.0-RELEASE, and improving documentation.</p>
<p>As always, if you would like to help out (even with documentation, there&#8217;s plenty to do there!) please stop by in IRC (#annvix on freenode) or drop a note in the developer&#8217;s mailing list.  The more the merrier!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.annvix.org/2008/02/03/31-current-gaia-branched/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blog converted to Wordpress</title>
		<link>http://blog.annvix.org/2008/01/19/blog-converted-to-wordpress/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.annvix.org/2008/01/19/blog-converted-to-wordpress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 02:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Danen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.annvix.org/2008/01/19/blog-converted-to-wordpress/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since I switched my personal blog (on linsec.ca) to wordpress a few months ago, I&#8217;ve wanted to do the same here once I had a better feel for whether I liked it better than s9y.  If not, then I would have converted the other one back.  Anyways, I do like wordpress better so [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since I switched my personal blog (on <a href="http://linsec.ca/">linsec.ca</a>) to wordpress a few months ago, I&#8217;ve wanted to do the same here once I had a better feel for whether I liked it better than s9y.  If not, then I would have converted the other one back.  Anyways, I do like wordpress better so instead of tracking two different blogging packages, I opted to move the Annvix blog to wordpress.  Conversion is done, I think it looks a bit sharper now, and all the old content/authors are back.  Enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.annvix.org/2008/01/19/blog-converted-to-wordpress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review of Annvix posted on linux.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.annvix.org/2008/01/16/review-of-annvix-posted-on-linuxcom/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.annvix.org/2008/01/16/review-of-annvix-posted-on-linuxcom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Danen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Testimonials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog2.annvix.org/?p=94</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was an independent review done of Annvix on Linux.com today (for once, this is a review done by someone other than myself).  It was actually a pretty good review.  Check it out here:  www.linux.com/feature/124243.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was an independent review done of Annvix on Linux.com today (for once, this is a review done by someone other than myself).  It was actually a pretty good review.  Check it out here:  <a href="http://www.linux.com/feature/124243">www.linux.com/feature/124243</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.annvix.org/2008/01/16/review-of-annvix-posted-on-linuxcom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
